Competitor Backlink Analysis: A 7-Step Report Process

skybacklinkPublished: Last updated:
Competitor Backlink Analysis: A 7-Step Report Process

Short answer

Competitor backlink analysis takes 7 steps: (1) pick real competitors from the SERP, (2) export their profiles with a tool, (3) find shared sources via link intersect, (4) filter for quality, (5) read the anchor and target-page distribution, (6) reverse-engineer their link acquisition tactics, (7) turn findings into a prioritized action list. The output isn't a list — it's a plan that says 'we will earn links from these 20 sources next quarter.'

Where Did Your Competitor Find Those Links?

The site sitting two positions above you doesn't write better content than you — you've checked. Site speed is comparable, page structure is comparable. The difference lives in one place: the link profile. So how was that profile built? From which sources, with which anchors, for which pages? The good news is that in the backlink world your competitor largely plays with an open hand — every link is a public record sitting in the tools' indexes. Your job is to read those records systematically and turn them into a plan.

That's exactly what we'll do in this article: a 7-step analysis process that ends with an actionable report in your hands. Any one of the Ahrefs/Semrush/Moz trio will do as the tool; the method works the same in all of them.

Step 1: Pick Real Competitors (Not the Ones You Assume)

The first step, and the one most often done wrong. Your commercial competitor and your SERP competitor don't have to be the same company. If the giant of your industry never shows up for your target queries, it's the wrong subject for this analysis.

To choose well:

  • List your 10-15 most valuable queries.
  • For each query, note the domains sitting on page one.
  • Put the 3-5 domains of similar scale to yours that recur across three or more queries on your analysis list.
  • Strike marketplaces, dictionaries and mega-portals from the list; their link dynamics can't serve as your model.

Step 2: Export the Profiles and Normalize the Format

For each competitor you've chosen, export these fields from your tool: source URL, source domain, target URL, anchor text, link type (dofollow/nofollow), first seen date, and the source domain's authority score. Merge everything into one table and add a "competitor" column.

Two practical rules at this stage:

  1. Deduplicate by domain. 500 sitewide links from the same domain should count as one row; otherwise footer and sidebar links will drown the table.
  2. Apply a date filter. Links from the last 12-18 months describe the competitor's current strategy; links from five years ago are a history lesson.

When reading authority scores, remember that DA and DR are different calculations by different companies; don't mix the two in one column. What these metrics measure — and where they fall short — is covered in detail in DA vs DR metrics.

Do Nofollow Links Belong in the Report?

They do, but in their own column. Even though nofollow links don't pass PageRank, they tell you two things. First, which publications the competitor is visible in — most big news sites mark external links nofollow, and those links still carry brand awareness and referral traffic. Second, some nofollow sources are the doorway to a dofollow opportunity: your competitor got content placed there, and you can take the relationship one step further. So instead of filtering them out, tag them and keep them at low priority.

Step 3: Run the Link Intersect — the Heart of the Analysis

One competitor's links are interesting; the links shared by several competitors are gold. A source linking to two or three of your competitors at once is very likely an open door in your niche: an industry directory, a blog that accepts submissions, or a publisher you can build a relationship with.

The "Link Intersect" / "Backlink Gap" feature in the tools does exactly this: it runs the query "domains linking to these competitors but not to me." Tier the output like so:

Tier Definition Priority
A Domains linking to 3+ competitors but not to you Highest — the first outreach list
B Domains linking to 2 competitors High
C Domains linking to one competitor, high authority Medium — evaluated case by case
D Domains linking to one competitor, low authority Low — most fall out in filtering

Step 4: Filter for Quality — Don't Import the Junk

Not every source in a competitor's profile is a target. Your filtering questions:

  • Does it have real traffic? Sites with near-zero organic traffic that exist only to sell links are the first to go.
  • Is the content relevant to the niche? A crypto blog linking to a home renovation site — who is that a good signal for?
  • Is its outbound link profile clean? Sources handing out dozens of unrelated external links per page have the classic look of a link farm.
  • Are there network footprints? Groups of sites on the same IP block, built on the same template, are the typical PBN pattern; your competitor may have taken that risk — you don't have to. To learn to recognize these patterns, see what is a PBN.

Experience says this: a notable share of a middle-aged competitor profile — sometimes a third, sometimes more — fails this filter. The list that remains is short, but every row of it earns its keep.

Step 5: Read the Anchor and Target-Page Distribution

The source list answers "where from"; this step answers "how". Take two pivots on the competitor table:

Anchor distribution: What are the competitor's ratios of branded, naked URL, exact match, and partial match? The distribution of sites that hold page one consistently is the best available estimate of the "natural pattern" in your niche — a more valuable reference than any one-size-fits-all percentages. How to calibrate your own profile against that pattern is detailed in anchor text ratios.

Target page distribution: Are the links going to the homepage, category pages, or blog content? A competitor earning links straight to money pages and a competitor gathering links to informational content first, then passing strength through internal links, are telling two different strategies. Look at which one holds its rankings more steadily; that's the model you imitate.

Step 6: Reverse-Engineer the Tactics

Step back from the individual sources and look at patterns. Classify how each link "was probably acquired":

  • Editorial/natural: News sites, genuine blog citations. Can't be copied, but they inspire: which of the competitor's content pulled links? Building a better version is within your reach.
  • Guest posts / sponsored posts: Pieces bylined by a competitor's employee or tagged as sponsored. The same publishers will very likely accept placements from you too; we examined the cost ranges in sponsored post pricing.
  • Directories and business listings: Chambers of commerce, industry associations, local directories. Low effort, quickly completed.
  • Purchased placements: Footer and sidebar blocks, sponsor slots. Here the quality of the source is everything; the ones that survive filtering go into the plan.

When this classification is done, you'll also see roughly where the competitor's link budget flows: are they producing content, buying placements, or building relationships?

Step 7: Turn the Report into an Action Plan

The output of the analysis shouldn't be a spreadsheet — it should be a to-do list. The report skeleton I recommend:

  1. Summary (half a page): Per competitor — profile size, growth rate, dominant tactic.
  2. Opportunity list (the main section): Sources that survived filtering; each row with the source, contact method, estimated cost, owner, and deadline.
  3. Content gaps: Topics where the competitor attracts links and you have no equivalent.
  4. Anchor calibration: The niche's natural pattern and your current deviation from it.
  5. Risks: Patterns seen in the competitor that should not be imitated.

Let's frame it with a sample calculation: if Tier A yields 20 sources and outreach to half of them pays off within three months, you end the quarter with 10 new quality sources — for most new and mid-sized sites, a volume that visibly changes the profile. For those who'd rather not run outreach and publication tracking by hand, panels like skybacklink make it possible to manage the order-approval-publication cycle from one screen with exactly the kind of publishers you've filtered for; the analysis stays your job, the operations become the panel's.

What Does the Analysis Yield Beyond Links? (Bonus Takeaways)

Read carefully, the report hands you three byproducts on top of the source list:

  • A content idea pool: The competitor's most-linked pages show which content format attracts citations in your niche. Pricing guide, comparison, data study? List the top 10 link magnets separately; next quarter's content plan largely writes itself from there.
  • Publisher price intelligence: If multiple competitors are buying placements from the same publisher, that source's price-performance has been market-tested; it strengthens your hand in negotiation.
  • Timing patterns: Does the competitor's link acquisition graph track campaign periods, or does it flow steadily? A steady flow usually means an institutional process is running; sudden spikes point to bulk buying — the latter is both an opportunity and a warning for you.

There's a reverse reading, too: look at the links the competitor is losing. If the tools' "lost links" report shows regular losses, those may be rented placements expiring; the same publishers may now sell that slot to you.

Three Common Mistakes

  • Admiring the total: The sentence "the competitor has 12,000 backlinks" says nothing on its own; how many are unique domains, how many survive filtering — the report starts with that question.
  • Taking a one-off snapshot: A profile is a living thing; set up the rhythm of a full quarterly analysis plus a monthly "new links" check.
  • Ending the analysis without a plan: No finding earns a link until it's tied to a deadline and an owner. The last page of the report should always say "here is what gets done in the next 90 days."

Competitor analysis is the compass of backlink work: it tells you where to go, but you still have to walk the road. Pick the compass up once a quarter; in between, run the plan.

  • #competitor analysis
  • #backlink research
  • #link intersect
  • #seo report

Frequently asked questions

Which tools do I need for competitor analysis?

Ahrefs, Semrush and Moz are the usual trio; each has a link intersect (backlink gap) feature. On a tight budget a single tool is enough, because the method is tool-independent: export, intersect, filter, plan. Since the tools' indexes differ in size, base decisions on ratios and patterns rather than absolute numbers.

How many competitors should I analyze?

3-5 competitors is the practical limit. With fewer than two, intersect analysis loses its meaning; past five, the data becomes unmanageable and the report bloats before it turns into action. Picking sites of similar scale that rank consistently for your target queries beats trying to copy the giants.

Does it make sense to copy every one of a competitor's links?

No. Competitor profiles contain junk too; sometimes a sizable share of the profile is worthless directories and spam sources. The goal isn't to copy — it's to pull the quality, reachable sources that survive filtering into your own plan. Importing a competitor's mistakes is the most common side effect of this analysis.

How often should I repeat this analysis?

Quarterly is a sensible rhythm for the full analysis. Monthly, checking only the 'new links' report is enough: which new sources did the competitor earn links from, which page did they support. That way you won't miss a change of direction between the big analyses.

Is it worthwhile for a small site to analyze a big competitor?

Yes, but with a different goal. The giant's total profile won't guide you; its newly acquired links and its mid-authority sources will. Better still, finding the big competitor's weak pages — topics that bring traffic without attracting links — is the most valuable output for a small site.

References

  1. Ahrefs Blog — Competitor Backlink Analysis Articles
  2. Semrush Blog — Backlink Analysis
  3. Moz — Backlinks (Link Fundamentals)

More from this category